Subject: FW: Motion To Convene Settlement Conference
From: [email-masked]
To: [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked]
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 15:25:20 -0700 (PDT)

FYI.  Obviously, we would want to participate in any settlement discussions.  Do you see any reason why we would not want to support the motion to establish the settlement procedure?  SRP indicates that the ongoing proceedings would not be delayed.  

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Joel Greene <[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]>>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTE[email-masked]] <mailto:[mailto:IMCEANOTE[email-masked]]> 
Sent:	Monday, August 13, 2001 4:28 PM
Subject:	Motion To Convene Settlement Conference

Attached is a draft motion of Salt River Project to establish a date certain
for convening a settlement conference under Rule 602, in accordance with the
settlement package distributed on July 30. Paragraph 8 of the motion will
list all parties that are in support of this procedural motion.  A company's
support for the motion IN NO WAY reflects any agreement to support any
setttlement proposal.  It merely indicates a desire to initiate a parallel
settlement path without interfering with or delaying FERC's processing of
the ongoing proceedings. Please reply to all by COB Tuesday in advising
whether your company would like to be listed.  We intend to file on
Wednesday early afternoon.  Thank you.

Energy Advocates LLP
202-371-9889
202-371-9025 (fax)
[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]>
 <<rp00-336setmot1.doc>>

 - rp00-336setmot1.doc