Message-ID: <12251821.1075852859160.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 19:00:00 -0800 (PST) From: kim.ward@enron.com To: chris.foster@enron.com Subject: Re: Revised PPL/Griffith Proposal Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Kim Ward X-To: Chris H Foster X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \KWARD (Non-Privileged)\Ward, Kim S (Houston)\'Sent Mail X-Origin: Ward-K X-FileName: KWARD (Non-Privileged).pst Chris, I can't read these - but my real quesiton is - If the $.07 is a demand charge and Grigsby gets $.04, we should still get the other $.03 because it will be charged on all volumes that CAN be taken, whether they take them or not - right?? From: Chris H Foster 03/29/2001 01:22 PM To: Kim Ward/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Revised PPL/Griffith Proposal ---------------------- Forwarded by Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT on 03/29/2001 01:19 PM --------------------------- Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp. From: CoganJA@aol.com 03/29/2001 10:06 AM To: sbreen@czn.com cc: cfoster@enron.com Subject: Revised PPL/Griffith Proposal Sean, Attached is the revised PPL/Griffth Gas Supply Proposal and Economic Model. I will hand deliver these to Terry Crupi today. John - PPL - Griffith Gas Sales Proposal.ZIP