Message-ID: <23787315.1075851851642.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 09:19:00 -0800 (PST) From: lbracken@summitenergy.com To: kim.ward@enron.com Subject: Re: Fw: recommendation Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: "Lynn Bracken" X-To: X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Kim_Ward_Nov2001\Notes Folders\All documents X-Origin: WARD-K X-FileName: kward.nsf I think it will have to sit with Smurfit in some way or another. I had just wanted to let you know what John had said.? I would think you would require more of a procedure than what he mentioned. :-) Have a wonderful night.? I have a date. Lynn ----- Original Message ----- From: Kim.Ward@enron.com To: Lynn Bracken Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 4:58 PM Subject: Re: Fw: recommendation Matt is the one who told me about this and he found out about it from John. Today, we were able to dodge Socal's penalties because of some flexibility that we have.? Matt is currently assessing the situation with regards to penalties tomarrow.? We can buy intra-day gas but it will be at a big premium - and a cost to us.? I think that we will need to include language in our March contract to the effect that if Smurfit doesn't schedule with us and use a volume that is within Socal's imposed tolerance level, we will be able to pass the associated costs back to Smurfit. HOw do you think this will sit with Smurfit? Kim "Lynn Bracken" on 02/14/2001 01:45:40 PM Please respond to "Lynn Bracken" To:?? cc: Subject:? Fw: recommendation ----- Original Message ----- From: Ewing, John To: Lynn Bracken Cc: Dunsmoor, Earl Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 4:26 PM Subject: RE: recommendation Lynn, Matt at (713) 853-0472 was apprised as soon as I? was that cogen was back up and running. Best regards, John? Ewing -----Original Message----- From: Lynn Bracken [SMTP:lbracken@summitenergy.com] Sent:? Wednesday, February 14, 2001 3:27 PM To: Ewing, John Cc: Joanne? Horalek Subject: Re: recommendation John Talked to Kim Ward at? Enron this afternoon to confirm pricing for rolling the contract forward. ? She expressed concern that there are specific tolerances that Enron has to abide? by or they will incur penalties. She stated that Enron contacted the LA? Vernon site today to see if you were running. They were told no, and she? said that later today that changed without notice to Enron. This may have? been an oversight today, but a concern when trying to move forward with any? marketer. To eliminate the baseload requirements and Gas Daily pricing? for swing volumes, the plant has to be proactive in notifying Enron of any significant changes in usage. Otherwise, Enron will force the penalties back to SSCC. Thank you, Lynn