Message-ID: <1779420.1075851853107.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 23:37:00 -0800 (PST)
From: baveety@pplweb.com
To: kim.ward@enron.com
Subject: RE: gas to Griffith
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: baveety@pplweb.com
X-To: Kim.Ward@enron.com
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Kim_Ward_Nov2001\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: WARD-K
X-FileName: kward.nsf

Thanks Kim! I'll be reviewing your offer with my boss early next week and will
be in touch. Have a good weekend.
Barb

-----Original Message-----
From: Kim.Ward@enron.com [mailto:Kim.Ward@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 03:44 PM
To: Veety, Barbra A.
Subject: gas to Griffith





Barb,

No problem for a July 01 start date on the gas supply we discussed this
morning.  The offer would remain the same whether June is included or not.
Also, we would make a reasonable best efforts to take and/or remarket your
gas when the Griffith plant is down.  Of course, if we couldn't do anything
with it, we would be held harmless.  Pricing would be based on a San Juan
Gas Daily Index minus $.02.  If we have to designate the plant as the
primary delivery point on the capacity, we wouldn't be able to flow the gas
to the border on a firm basis.  We may only be able to sell it back in the
basin.

Give me a call if you have any questions -

Thanks,

Kim Ward
713-853-0685