Message-ID: <26964828.1075851853900.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 03:54:00 -0800 (PST)
From: chris.foster@enron.com
To: sbreen@czn.com, coganja@aol.com
Subject: Griffith Economics
Cc: kim.ward@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: kim.ward@enron.com
X-From: Chris H Foster
X-To: sbreen@czn.com, coganja@aol.com
X-cc: Kim Ward
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Kim_Ward_Nov2001\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: WARD-K
X-FileName: kward.nsf

John/Sean:

I am a little confused on how the pricing indicated in your term sheet would 
work.  I think if we review the attached it will clarify things.  Please call 
me later to discuss.  I want to make sure we understand how the pricing would 
work for Griffith as well as Enron to Citizens.  

Also, I think the Commodity section of your proposal term sheet has some 
missing words.  You don't seem to be adding the spread value of interstate 
transport to the Commodity charge.  

I will be out for an hour.  Back at 1:00 Portland time.

Chris