Message-ID: <13777310.1075852852718.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 16:26:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: barry.tycholiz@enron.com
To: jeff.dasovich@enron.com
Subject: DWR Gas Supply
Cc: houston <.ward@enron.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: houston <.ward@enron.com>
X-From: Tycholiz, Barry </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=BTYCHOL>
X-To: Dasovich, Jeff </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jdasovic>
X-cc: Ward, Kim S (Houston) </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Kward>
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \KWARD (Non-Privileged)\Ward, Kim S (Houston)\CDWR
X-Origin: Ward-K
X-FileName: KWARD (Non-Privileged).pst

Jeff, further to our conversation... this is the list of companies that have entered into contractual agreements with the DWR. I don't know if this means they have transaction but perhaps between Kim Ward and yourself, you can advise.

What I need to know is the legal status/issues ( if any ) of any of the companies listed here today as it relates to the state of California. 
Pan Canadian Energy Services, Occidental Energy Marketing, Dynegy Marketing and Trading , Texaco Natural Gas, BP Amoco, and Coast Energy Group. 

Can you advise If any of these companies form part of ongoing legal action against the state?

Once I know this, then we can decide on a plan what we should discuss with Mark Baldwin.

Thanks in advance. 

BT