Message-ID: <32446932.1075851863714.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 08:45:00 -0800 (PST) From: lbracken@summitenergy.com To: kim.ward@enron.com Subject: Fw: recommendation Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: "Lynn Bracken" X-To: X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Kim_Ward_Nov2001\Notes Folders\Discussion threads X-Origin: WARD-K X-FileName: kward.nsf ? ----- Original Message ----- From: Ewing, John To: Lynn Bracken Cc: Dunsmoor, Earl Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 4:26 PM Subject: RE: recommendation Lynn, Matt at (713) 853-0472 was apprised as soon as I was that cogen was back up and running. Best regards, John Ewing -----Original Message----- From: Lynn Bracken [SMTP:lbracken@summitenergy.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 3:27 PM To: Ewing, John Cc: Joanne Horalek Subject: Re: recommendation John Talked to Kim Ward at Enron this afternoon to confirm pricing for rolling the contract forward.? She expressed concern that there are specific tolerances that Enron has to abide by or they will incur penalties.? She stated that Enron contacted the LA Vernon site today to see if you were running.? They were told no, and she said that later today that changed without notice to Enron. This may have been an oversight today, but a concern when trying to move forward with any marketer.? To eliminate the baseload requirements and Gas Daily pricing for swing volumes, the plant has to be proactive in notifying Enron of any significant changes in usage.? Otherwise, Enron will force the penalties back to SSCC. Thank you, Lynn