Message-ID: <27549003.1075851863851.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 01:06:00 -0800 (PST)
From: eric.boyt@enron.com
To: kim.ward@enron.com
Subject: City of Mesa Summary - 2/21/01
Cc: eric.moon@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: eric.moon@enron.com
X-From: Eric Boyt
X-To: Kim Ward
X-cc: Eric Moon
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Kim_Ward_Nov2001\Notes Folders\Discussion threads
X-Origin: WARD-K
X-FileName: kward.nsf

Just a refresher in case you need it today (off of last nights curve and 
assuming Grigsby's offer is .04)

Eric


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Boyt/Corp/Enron on 02/22/2001 09:04 
AM ---------------------------


Eric Boyt
02/16/2001 04:50 PM
To: Kim Ward/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Eric Moon/HOU/ECT@ECT 

Subject: City of Mesa Summary - 2/16/01


Kim, 

Here is the summary.  The bottom line is that by unwinding balance of 
February (2/20-2/28) and the rest of the deal (Mar '01-Jul '02) from a $3.74 
price to a $4.18 price nets Mesa a $.24 discount of the new Index deal (Aug 
'01-Jan '02)

To get them to a $.30 discount on the new Index deal, Mesa would need to 
raise the fix price on the current deal to $4.26.

Eric