Message-ID: <28221835.1075851872164.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 08:55:00 -0800 (PST)
From: dan.hyvl@enron.com
To: kim.ward@enron.com
Subject: Re: palo alto RFP response
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Dan J Hyvl
X-To: Kim Ward
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Kim_Ward_Nov2001\Notes Folders\Palo alto
X-Origin: WARD-K
X-FileName: kward.nsf

Kim,
 The response to III P. should be Not Applicable, unless you are having 
someone obtain a Certificate of Good Standing from the State of California.  
 The response to III Q. should be that the Final Contract and Transaction 
Agreement will be signed by a Vice President of Enron North America Corp. and 
as agreed with the City's counsel, a Certificate of Incumbency shall be 
provided to verify that the person signing is an officer of the Company.
 The remainder of the document appears okay.  I was curious as to how you 
were going to respond to their statement regarding their potential purchase 
of interstate transportation assets and their request that we manage these 
assets for them.  Repricing should work.

 Call me if you have any further questions.



	Kim Ward
	03/14/2001 04:09 PM
		
		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Re: palo alto RFP response

No - that is wierd. Let's try again.





Dan J Hyvl
03/14/2001 02:08 PM
To: Kim Ward/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Re: palo alto RFP response  

Kim,
 Is the attached what you intended for me to review?



	Kim Ward
	03/14/2001 03:18 PM
		 
		 To: Dan Hyvl
		 cc: 
		 Subject: palo alto RFP response

ROUGH Draft!!

Thanks for your review and help!!

kim