Message-ID: <22808943.1075852869138.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 12:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: houston <.ward@enron.com>
To: patti.sullivan@enron.com, jan.sutherland@enron.com
Subject: FW: June Natural Gas Billing
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Ward, Kim S (Houston) </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KWARD>
X-To: Sullivan, Patti </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Psulliv>, Sutherland, Jan </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jsutherl>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \KWARD (Non-Privileged)\Ward, Kim S (Houston)\Sent Items
X-Origin: Ward-K
X-FileName: KWARD (Non-Privileged).pst

Could you guys look into this for me?  Why would they be billed different volumes by us vs. SoCal?

Thanks,

Kim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Paxton, AM (Arnold)" <Arnold.M.Paxton@akzo-nobel.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Paxton+2C+20AM+20+28Arnold+29+22+20+3CArnold+2EM+2EPaxton+40akzo-nobel+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com] 
Sent:	Thursday, July 26, 2001 2:20 PM
To:	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Cc:	Martinelli, RA (Ray)
Subject:	FW: June Natural Gas Billing

Kim,

Still waiting to hear from you on this?
						Arnold Paxton/323 260-8881

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Paxton, AM (Arnold)
> Sent:	Friday, July 13, 2001 3:01 PM
> To:	'Kim.Ward@enron.com'
> Cc:	Martinelli, RA (Ray)
> Subject:	June Natural Gas Billing
>
> Kim,
>
> We rec'd an invoice for June natural gas usage and note a discrepancy in
> the number of mmbtu billed. Enron billed us for 34,086 mmbtu and The Gas
> Co billed us for 29,750 mmbtu? Doesn't Enron get their information on
> mmbtu used from The Gas Co.
>
>
> please check and advise,
>
> 					Arnold Paxton
> 					323 260-8881