Message-ID: <29425642.1075852867281.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 13:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: s..ward@enron.com
To: h..foster@enron.com
Subject: term sheet for thermo ecotek
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Ward, Kim S. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KWARD>
X-To: Foster, Chris H. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Cfoster>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \KWARD (Non-Privileged)\Ward, Kim S (Houston)\Sent Items
X-Origin: Ward-K
X-FileName: KWARD (Non-Privileged).pst

Chris, 

If you have a minute, will you look at this term sheet?  His volumes are really small but if we get the Palo Alto deal it won't be that big of a deal - unless we have to schedule less than 1 MMBtu. Oh yo!  His average daily volume, for both plants is about 178/day, based on annual usage.  I have proposed basically a GD deal with a first of the month index option if he can set a BDQ.

Thanks in advance.

Kim