Message-ID: <32573541.1075860913237.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 06:30:26 -0800 (PST) From: lindy.donoho@enron.com To: kimberly.watson@enron.com Subject: RE: PG&E 2001 Capacity Release Transactions on Transwestern Pipeline Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Donoho, Lindy X-To: Watson, Kimberly X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Kim_Watson_Mar2002\Watson, Kimberly\Capacity Release X-Origin: Watson-K X-FileName: kwatson (Non-Privileged).pst Yes, Shelley & I discussed this on Monday. Isn't that interesting? I wish we could slip this into some data request or something. -----Original Message----- From: Watson, Kimberly Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 8:22 AM To: Donoho, Lindy Subject: FW: PG&E 2001 Capacity Release Transactions on Transwestern Pipeline Importance: High Lindy, I accidentally left you off my earlier distribution to the marketers. FYI, Kim. -----Original Message----- From: Corman, Shelley Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 4:39 PM To: McCarty, Danny; Harris, Steven; Watson, Kimberly Subject: PG&E 2001 Capacity Release Transactions on Transwestern Pipeline Importance: High FYI While I have been periodically giving updates on the above max rate capacity release activity, I was surprised by the magnitude of the PG&E value above max. rates. For the 12 months ended 9/30/01 we had net cash payments to PG&E. (approx $18 mil revenues to Cal. + $5.6 revenue on San Juan - $28 million in above max rate capacity release activity = ($4.4) million << File: TW_pge 2001caprls.XLS >>