Message-ID: <3017043.1075860916349.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 07:11:19 -0800 (PST) From: gary.choquette@enron.com To: darrell.schoolcraft@enron.com, david.roensch@enron.com, rich.jolly@enron.com, kimberly.watson@enron.com, scott.hill@enron.com, russ.ulibarri@enron.com, mark.mcconnell@enron.com Subject: RE: preliminary report Cc: steve.january@enron.com, gary.spraggins@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: steve.january@enron.com, gary.spraggins@enron.com X-From: Choquette, Gary X-To: Schoolcraft, Darrell , Roensch, David , Jolly, Rich , Watson, Kimberly , Hill, Scott , Ulibarri, Russ , McConnell, Mark X-cc: January, Steve , Spraggins, Gary X-bcc: X-Folder: \Kim_Watson_Mar2002\Watson, Kimberly\Citizens X-Origin: Watson-K X-FileName: kwatson (Non-Privileged).pst Has anyone got a drawing or sketch of the Citizens Plant Station? To me, it sounds like they picked the wrong type of control valve (for the noise issue). -----Original Message----- From: Schoolcraft, Darrell Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 11:04 AM To: Roensch, David; Jolly, Rich; Watson, Kimberly; Choquette, Gary; Hill, Scott; Ulibarri, Russ; McConnell, Mark Cc: January, Steve; Spraggins, Gary Subject: FW: preliminary report Below is a perliminary report that Citizens sent and their recommendation. Please note Rob's message. Gary will you and Tiny review the report and next week we can set a conference call to discuss what we think that can be done if we choose to regulate our pressure to the Citizens site. The call will include all the above personnel. After we have our call I would like to call Citizens and let them know if there is anything TW can or is willing to do, or is it a Citizens design problem. I will let everyone know the dial in number on Monday. I will be on vacation tomorrow. Thanks DS -----Original Message----- From: "Franson, Rob" @ENRON Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 9:58 AM To: dschool@enron.com Subject: FW: preliminary report -----Original Message----- From: Franson, Rob Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 9:07 AM To: 'darrell.schoolcraft@enron.com' Subject: FW: preliminary report Attached is a copy of the preliminary report that recommends that the inlet pressure to Citizens "Griffith Plant" Station be limited to 740 psig. Note that this is only a preliminary report that Citizens is reviewing. Some of our "reviewers" are on vacation, and have held up the process of getting this report finalized. Since I was temporarily assigned to another position during the time that gas was introduced to this line, I have asked my employee Martin Conboy to create a log of events on how these stations had been operated. I will send it to you later today. Can you have David Roensch review to see if anything is missing. I feel that it is a good idea to document the different operation modes with results prior to agreeing on any further changes. -----Original Message----- From: Ray Kelm - Kelm Engineering [mailto:ray@kelm-engr.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 3:22 PM To: Robert Franson - Citizens Subject: preliminary report Robert, I had to delete a couple figures to get the size below 1 meg to email. Call if you have questions. Ray - CZN102301mod.doc << File: CZN102301mod.doc >>