Subject: FW: TransPecos KMI LOI
From: [email-masked]
To: [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked]
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 09:00:53 -0800 (PST)

Can you help with this one?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Howard, Kevin A.  
Sent:	Thursday, March 07, 2002 4:38 PM
To:	Hayslett, Rod; Saunders, James; Peters, Jerry; Geaccone, Tracy
Subject:	RE: TransPecos KMI LOI

Does anyone know what the timing of the expenditures would look like? Demonstrating financial ability to fund would be difficult at the current time! I thought we wanted KMI to do the construction? I don't have any real issues with the LOI. 
Kevin

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayslett, Rod  
Sent:	Thursday, March 07, 2002 3:54 PM
To:	Howard, Kevin A.; Saunders, James; Peters, Jerry; Geaccone, Tracy
Subject:	FW: TransPecos KMI LOI

What do you think?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Harris, Steven  
Sent:	Thursday, March 07, 2002 3:49 PM
To:	Horton, Stanley; Hayslett, Rod
Subject:	FW: TransPecos KMI LOI

Stan/ Rod, here is the most recent red-lined version of the TransPecos agreement. We have substanially changed numerous items from the prior
red-line and feel this more accurately represents TW's interests. Please review the  document and let me know if you are comfortable with it. In particular, we have softened the language requiring us to demonstrate our financial ability to provide services under the agreement. 

At this point, we are just trying to agree on the basics of the K/M LOI so that we can get the transport rate proposal in front of Pemex.    

Steve
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McConnell, Mark  
Sent:	Thursday, March 07, 2002 3:27 PM
To:	Harris, Steven
Subject:	TransPecos KMI LOI

 << File: TransPecos KMI LOI3-04-02.doc >> 

Mark McConnell
Transwestern Pipeline Company
713-345-7896   office
713-822-4862   cell
713-646-2551   fax
[email-masked]