Message-ID: <4890674.1075852890348.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 08:05:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: kimberly.watson@enron.com
To: tk.lohman@enron.com
Subject: FW: SoCal Needles "Window" allocation
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Watson, Kimberly </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KWATSON>
X-To: Lohman, TK </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Tlohman>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \KWATSON (Non-Privileged)\Watson, Kimberly\Sent Items
X-Origin: Watson-K
X-FileName: KWATSON (Non-Privileged).pst

TK, since you, Steve and I are traveling tomorrow, could you work with Lynn to schedule this meeting for Wednesday.  You, for sure, need to be there.  

Thanks, Kim.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Blair, Lynn  
Sent:	Friday, July 20, 2001 5:24 PM
To:	Hass, Glen; Williams, Jo; Watson, Kimberly; Donoho, Lindy; Lohman, TK; January, Steven; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Holmes, Bradley; Harris, Steven
Cc:	Blair, Lynn; Corman, Shelley; Garcia, Ava
Subject:	SoCal Needles "Window" allocation

	
	I would like to have a meeting to review pros and cons in relation to the
	procedure Transwestern is using today for the SoCal Needles "window" allocation.

	Some of the questions being asked:

	1.  Why are we allocating for SoCal, (at their request)?

	2.  Why are we allowing SoCal to set the capacity lower than TW's primary firm?

	3.  What are the options for TW to change the alloction procedure at Needles?

	I am sure there is a host of other questions we could answer as well.  We are looking
	at Tuesday, July 24, at 9:00 a.m or Wednesday, July 25, 1:30 p.m.

	Please let Ava Garcia (713-853-5842) know which day is better for you.  Then we will
	get a room and let everyone know date and time.  

	Thanks. Lynn