Message-ID: <15246805.1075852890436.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 08:18:56 -0700 (PDT) From: kimberly.watson@enron.com To: steven.harris@enron.com, jan.moore@enron.com Subject: FW: TW Capacity Affected for Red Rock Tie-ins (CORRECTION) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-From: Watson, Kimberly X-To: Harris, Steven , Moore, Jan X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \KWATSON (Non-Privileged)\Watson, Kimberly\Sent Items X-Origin: Watson-K X-FileName: KWATSON (Non-Privileged).pst FYI, Kim. -----Original Message----- From: Graves, Jerry=20 Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 10:55 AM To: Hubbard, Dave; Faucheaux, Eric; Centilli, James; Watson, Kimberly; Lind= berg, Lorraine; Rance, Byron; Eisenstein, Arnold L.; Gottsponer, Morgan; As= ante, Ben; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Jolly, Rich; Chanley, Earl; January, Steve= n; Roensch, David Cc: Graves, Jerry Subject: RE: TW Capacity Affected for Red Rock Tie-ins (CORRECTION) FYI, =20 I am going to enter the outage dates and estimate flows into the outage dat= abase. Hopefully we can sure up the dates as we get closer the tie-ins. =20 Jerry Graves =20 =20 -----Original Message----- From: Hubbard, Dave=20 Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 6:59 AM To: Faucheaux, Eric; Centilli, James; Watson, Kimberly; Lindberg, Lorraine;= Rance, Byron; Eisenstein, Arnold L.; Gottsponer, Morgan; Asante, Ben; Scho= olcraft, Darrell; Graves, Jerry; Jolly, Rich; Chanley, Earl Subject: FW: TW Capacity Affected for Red Rock Tie-ins (CORRECTION) =20 TW Red Rock Team: Just spoke with Byron Rance and his message should read a= s follows for the Tie-In Schedule. (Station 2 was listed twice; the second= listing for March tie-ins should be Station 3.) After discussion with Arnold Eisenstein, the following are (very) tentative= dates for tie ins. =20 Station 2, mainline, October 22, 2001, 4 days Station 2, loop, November 5. 2 days =20 Station 1, mainline, March 4, 2002, 4 days Station 1, loop, March 13, 2002, 2 days =20 Station 3 , mainline, March 18, 2002, 4 days Station 3 , loop, March 28, 2002, 2 days. [Hubbard, Dave] -----Original Message-----=20 [Hubbard, Dave] =20 From: Rance, Byron=20 Sent: Thu 7/19/2001 10:40 PM=20 To: Faucheaux, Eric=20 Cc: Eisenstein, Arnold L.; Chanley, Earl; Jolly, Rich; Roensch, David; Asan= te, Ben; Crabtree, Steve=20 Subject: RE: TW Capacity Affected for Red Rock Tie-ins After discussion with Arnold Eisenstein, the following are (very) tentative= dates for tie ins. =20 Station 2, mainline, October 22, 2001, 4 days Station 2, loop, November 5. 2 days =20 Station 1, mainline, March 4, 2002, 4 days Station 1, loop, March 13, 2002, 2 days =20 Station 2[Hubbard, Dave] (Station 3) , mainline, March 18, 2002, 4 days Station 2[Hubbard, Dave] (Station 3) , loop, March 28, 2002, 2 days. -----Original Message-----=20 From: Faucheaux, Eric=20 Sent: Thu 7/19/2001 4:53 PM=20 To: Centilli, James; Watson, Kimberly; Lindberg, Lorraine=20 Cc: Rance, Byron; Eisenstein, Arnold L.; Gottsponer, Morgan; Asante, Ben; S= choolcraft, Darrell; Graves, Jerry; Jolly, Rich; Chanley, Earl=20 Subject: TW Capacity Affected for Red Rock Tie-ins=20 The following volumes are capacities west of Station 1 that will result fro= m tie-in construction work slated for the Red Rock expansion. Tie-in assem= blies will be required on both the Mainline and Loopline at stations 1, 2, = and 3. New block and side valve assemblies for new compressor and scrubber= s will be installed on the suction side main and loop lines at each station= . The tie-in will entail blocking (isolating) a line segment within the st= ation yard on the suction side (each line done separately) thus creating a = dead leg back to the next upstream block valve crossover(s). Hence, all of= the flow will be forced into a single line when making tie-in on the adjac= ent pipeline line. The result of forcing all volumes into a single line wi= ll produce greater pressure losses in the operating segment to the existing= compression and reduce throughput due to lower suction pressure and respec= tive horsepower limitations. Discharge piping at the station having tie-in= work will be unchanged regarding valving configurations. Tie-in Schedule/Duration Capacity X-over Status CS 2 ML Oct '01 / 4 days 960 MMcfd MLV 3010-open us/ds x-over;= open us 30" x-over CS 2 LL Oct '01 / 2 days 960 MMcfd MLV 3010-open us/ds= x-over, open us 30" x-over CS 1 ML Mar '02 / 4 days 990 MMcfd MLV 2012 & 2011-open us/ds = x-over; open us 30" x-over CS 1 LL Mar '02 / 2 days 990 MMcfd MLV 2012 & 2011-open us/ds = x-over; open us 30" x-over CS 3 ML Apr '02 / 4 days 1010 MMcfd MLV 4012 & 4011-open us/ds = x-over; open us 30" x-over CS 3 LL Apr '02 / 2 days 1010 MMcfd MLV 4012 & 4011-open us/ds = x-over; open us 30"x-over Notes: 1. Specific schedule dates are forthcoming=20 2. Schedules could be impacted by material deliveries and is based upo= n receipt of construction permits=20 3. Durations consider working around the clock until completed