Message-ID: <33112150.1075852896259.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 15:21:25 -0700 (PDT) From: kimberly.watson@enron.com To: lindy.donoho@enron.com Subject: FW: draft answer Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Watson, Kimberly X-To: Donoho, Lindy X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \KWATSON (Non-Privileged)\Watson, Kimberly\Sent Items X-Origin: Watson-K X-FileName: KWATSON (Non-Privileged).pst -----Original Message----- From: Fossum, Drew Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 5:02 PM To: Pavlou, Maria; Van Norden, Mike; 'sstojic@gbmdc.com'; Kirk, Steve; Porter, Gregory J.; 'rnuschler@akingump.com'; 'cmoore@akingump.com'; Miller, Mary Kay; 'fkelly@gbmdc.com'; Harris, Steven; Watson, Kimberly Subject: RE: draft answer Great draft Maria. I couldn't resist adding some stuff. Remember Kathy's transcript correction? Barry's testimony originally read exactly like Kathy's protest--they both demanded that released capacity and our own capacity be posted "on the same platform" whatever that means. The correction added "on the same page" to the "same platform" concept. I inserted a paragraph that suggested that the Indicated Shippers aren't sure what the hell they want and keep changing their story so should be ignored. Cut it if you like but it was amusing. DF -----Original Message----- From: Pavlou, Maria Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 9:54 AM To: Van Norden, Mike; 'sstojic@gbmdc.com'; Kirk, Steve; Porter, Gregory J.; 'rnuschler@akingump.com'; 'cmoore@akingump.com'; Fossum, Drew; Miller, Mary Kay Subject: draft answer << File: RP01-507 Answerind.doc >> We may want to make further clarifications to Section 13 and offer that up. Pls. let me know what you think. Thanks, Maria