Message-ID: <30944699.1075852892027.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2001 15:14:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: kimberly.watson@enron.com
To: igi@nctimes.net
Subject: RE: FW: Interconnect Agreement
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Watson, Kimberly </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KWATSON>
X-To: 'Kirk Ketcherside' <igi@nctimes.net>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \KWATSON (Non-Privileged)\Watson, Kimberly\Sent Items
X-Origin: Watson-K
X-FileName: KWATSON (Non-Privileged).pst

Kirk,

How about talking at 10:30am CST on Friday, August 10?  My day is pretty flexible, so if another time works better for you, please let me know.  

Thanks, Kim.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kirk Ketcherside [mailto:igi@nctimes.net]
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 4:26 PM
To: Watson, Kimberly
Subject: Re: FW: Interconnect Agreement


Kim-
Thanks for your message.
Let's look at Thurs or Friday of next week.
Hearings went good...next meeting on 8/20.
Should get vote following that meeting, then goes to ACC commissioners
for final vote by 9/18/01.
Stay tuned.
Thanks
Kirk

"Watson, Kimberly" wrote:
> 
> Hi Kirk,
> 
> I got your "out of the office" message the other day when I emailed you,
> so I knew you would be busy when you got back in the office.  My
> schedule is a little hectic tomorrow, my afternoon looks a little better
> than the morning.  Next week looks wide open.  Would you mind waiting
> until next week?  I just want to make sure we are not holding you up.
> Let me know your preference.
> 
> By the way, how did your testimony go on Big Sandy?
> 
> Thanks, Kim.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kirk Ketcherside [mailto:igi@nctimes.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 2:38 PM
> To: Watson, Kimberly
> Subject: Re: FW: Interconnect Agreement
> 
> Kim-
> Thanks for your recent message.
> I spent the last couple of days in Phoenix testifying on Big Sandy
> project and just picked up your message.
> I would look forward to visiting with you sometime Friday AM.
> Let me know if this works, or perhaps next week some time.
> I will be in Denver M-W, and then returning to my office on Th/F of next
> week.
> Kirk
> 
> "Ketcherside, Kirk L (IGI Resources)" wrote:
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Watson, Kimberly [mailto:Kimberly.Watson@enron.com]
> > Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 11:07 AM
> > To: KetcheKL@bp.com
> > Subject: Interconnect Agreement
> >
> > Good Morning Kirk,
> >
> > I hope you had a nice weekend.  I have been working on the
> Interconnect
> > Agreement for the Big Sandy Project and I would like to schedule some
> > time for a telephone conference with you as I have a few "blanks" in
> the
> > Interconnect Agreement that I would like to discuss with you so that
> our
> > draft is as complete as it can be.  Would you have some time on
> Tuesday
> > AM or Wednesday AM?  I would also be available on Thursday
> 2:00-3:00pm.
> > I'm thinking we need about a half an hour.
> >
> > Also, I can update you on the remaining capacity on our Red  Rock
> > Expansion which could be used to serve the plant.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Kim.
> > 713-853-3098.
> >
> > **********************************************************************
> > This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
> affiliate and
> > may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
> the
> > intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
> > others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
> (or
> > authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
> reply
> > to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
> all
> > copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are
> not
> > intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
> evidence a
> > binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
> > affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
> be
> > relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
> otherwise.
> > Thank you.
> > **********************************************************************