Message-ID: <23603299.1075860927937.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 09:25:02 -0800 (PST) From: kimberly.watson@enron.com To: elizabeth.brown@enron.com Subject: RE: Discounting of GRI on One-part Contracts Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Watson, Kimberly X-To: Brown, Elizabeth X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Kim_Watson_Mar2002\Watson, Kimberly\Sent Items X-Origin: Watson-K X-FileName: kwatson (Non-Privileged).pst Elizabeth, Yes I would like to discuss this with you. My schedule for Wednesday afternoon or Thursday looks good. How about you? Kim. -----Original Message----- From: Brown, Elizabeth Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 12:39 PM To: Buchanan, John; Watson, Kimberly Subject: Discounting of GRI on One-part Contracts Importance: High It again appears that some one-part contracts have not had the GRI commodity portion discounted to zero whenever possible. This detail needs to be reviewed monthly since it impacts Transwestern's bottom line. Can we discuss so that everyone is on the same page? Maybe we need a point person in the scheduling group to review a monthly report and identify who within Marketing will be updating/correcting the rates in CBS. Examples of discounted contracts in January 2002 where we paid out to the GRI rather than discounting to zero and taking the money to income: Sempra K #27808 PG&E Energy Trading K #27796 Western Gas K #27797 Agave K #27377 Tenaska K #27792 Please let me know what your thoughts are. Thanks, Elizabeth