Message-ID: <1828555.1075845459013.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 00:25:00 -0800 (PST)
From: greg.whalley@enron.com
To: john.arnold@enron.com
Subject: RE:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Greg Whalley
X-To: John Arnold
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Greg_Whalley_Oct2001\Notes Folders\Discussion threads
X-Origin: WHALLEY-G
X-FileName: gwhalley.nsf

They do look tight.  But after a $2 drop, you'd have to expect it to pinch.  
Seems like, unless things really fall out of bed, this spread should widen 
from here.  Even if the front stays relatively unchanged.

----Original Message-----
   >From:      John Arnold/HOU/ECT
   >To:          Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT
   >Cc:          
   >Bcc:      
   >Subj:      
   >Sent:     Wednesday, December 13, 2000 12:33 PM
   >
   >remember when you said there is a reason they call them bear spreads?
   >
   >bring up a chart of f/g or g/h.   
   >f/g is tighter now than anytime since march 99 when ff1 was worth 2.50
   >
   >
   >amazing