Message-ID: <33238120.1075858052423.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 01:19:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: jennifer.mcquade@enron.com
To: greg.whalley@enron.com
Subject: RE: FW: Crude 24X7 WTI Marketing Effort
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Jennifer Mcquade
X-To: Greg Whalley
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Lawrence_Whalley_Jun2001\Notes Folders\Discussion threads
X-Origin: Whalley-L
X-FileName: gwhalley.nsf

Greg,
You're absolutely correct (obviously), and I actually noted that when I first 
started sending that chart out. I did that so that they would be more in 
scale and fit on the same chart. The chart is provided only to identify the 
trend of our performance relative to the NYMEX. Perhaps I should note each 
day that these volumes have been adjusted so as not to be misleading. Or, if 
you wish, I could stop adjusting the numbers and just chart the absolute 
values.
Please let me know which you would prefer.

Thank you,
Jennifer McQuade

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Whalley, Greg  
Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 10:08 AM
To: Mcquade, Jennifer
Subject: Re: FW: Crude 24X7 WTI Marketing Effort

your volume comparison chart is off by a factor of 10.  each contract is 1000 
bbls.