Message-ID: <13289977.1075861992469.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 13:17:34 -0800 (PST)
From: mark.whitt@enron.com
To: barry.tycholiz@enron.com
Subject: RE: EPNG Proposal II
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Whitt, Mark </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MWHITT>
X-To: Tycholiz, Barry </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Btychol>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \MWHITT (Non-Privileged)\Whitt, Mark\Sent Items
X-Origin: Whitt-M
X-FileName: MWHITT (Non-Privileged).pst

We decide to leave out the $ value in order to focus them on the structure.  I do not see the conversation about option values on the pipe?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tycholiz, Barry  
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 2:10 PM
To:	Whitt, Mark
Subject:	FW: EPNG Proposal II

I thought we were going to show them a number to work with.... What is this conversation about option values on the pipe?  

BT 

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nemec, Gerald  
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 4:37 PM
To:	Fuller, Dave; Whitt, Mark
Cc:	Miller, Stephanie; Tycholiz, Barry
Subject:	RE: EPNG Proposal II

Attached is the document with one change. 

 << File: EPNG Capacity Proposal II1.doc >> 

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fuller, Dave  
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 2:56 PM
To:	Whitt, Mark
Cc:	Nemec, Gerald; Miller, Stephanie; Tycholiz, Barry
Subject:	EPNG Proposal II

All,

Here is a draft document for BP, please review and comment.

Dave

 << File: EPNG Capacity Proposal II.doc >>