Subject: RE: A3A1 Ad Hoc Review Team
From: [email-masked]
To: [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked]
Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 11:49:45 -0700 (PDT)

Timeliners:

Revision to yesterday's e-mail - due date is end of July.  So proposals by
mid-June, first draft report by early/mid-July, discussion throughout.

Bob

> ----------
> From: 	Harshbarger, Robert
> Sent: 	Monday, May 21, 2001 5:16 PM
> To: 	Ellingson, Mons; Fotiou, Demetrios; Grow, Lisa; Holden-Baker, Susan;
> Smith, Chris; Tilghman, Carmine; Underwood, John; Williams, Bill
> Cc: 	'Hackney, Mark'
> Subject: 	A3A1 Ad Hoc Review Team
>
> Yes, that's right, you did raise your hand for this.
>
> We are to submit to ISAS any recommendation(s) by August ??, 2001 (what
> was the date, I didn't write it down).
>
> Is there benefit to have a face-to-face meeting?  Either way, we'll use
> e-mail for discussion and maybe a conference call or two.
>
> First assignment is to read:
> *	A3A1-Interim is what we are currently running with.
> *	A3A1-version3-draft2 goes before the NERC BOT June 10-11.
> *	A3A1-candr contains public comments and responses from NERC IS.
>
> <<File: a3a1-interim.doc>><<File: a3a1v3d2-0501.doc>><<File:
> a3a1candr.doc>>
> Questions to keep in mind:
> *	Are our current timelines as good as it gets?
> *	Do we want to adopt the Eastern Interconnection's timelines?
> *	What are the deficiencies of our timelines?
> *	Will these deficiencies be present under 1.7?
> *	Which timing requirements could be changed with an reasonable amount
> of effort (i.e., tariff items, AGC ramp times, A3A1, etc.)?
>
> Remember....
> <<File: trainedpros.wav>>
>
>  Bob Harshbarger
>  OASIS Trading Manager
>  Puget Sound Energy
>  (425) 882-4643 voice
>  (425) 882-4496 fax
>  (206) 405-5161 pager
>  (206) 604-3251 cell
>