Message-ID: <18248114.1075839947115.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 12:00:59 -0700 (PDT) From: ryan.slinger@enron.com To: bill.williams@enron.com Subject: PSCO Schedule on 6/17/01 HE 7-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-From: Slinger, Ryan X-To: Williams III, Bill X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \ExMerge - Williams III, Bill\RT Cuts X-Origin: WILLIAMS-W3 X-FileName: We had an issue with a PSCO schedule at FC 345 for HE 7-8. Craig sold PSCO= 50 mw at the 345 bus. It was not specified which bus it was to be deliver= ed to. There was a tag put out and it was made by us and has PSCO listed a= s the PSE on the transmission from the 345 bus to the 230 bus. It was deni= ed so that does not mean much. I had a lengthy discussion with PSCO on thi= s around 7:40am on the 17th(turret #149). You will want to listen to the W= HOLE conversation since we take several different directions throughout the= conversation. Bert also had a prior discussion with them about 3 minutes = earlier on turret #143. Craig should have done the deal between 5am and 5:= 30 am. I finally got PSCO to take responsibility for the schedule in a sec= ond discussion at 8:15am. They are supposed to put in a transmission reque= st after the fact for HE 7. They claimed on the last phone call that Craig= did not say "until further" and they will not accept responsibility for HE= 8. He is supposed to pull tapes and get back to me but of course I have n= o faith in PSCO and am writing this now since, I'm sure you will hear on th= e tapes, the guy knows that he is wrong and wants to cover it up and hope s= ettlements doesn't get after him. thanks ryan