Message-ID: <19313317.1075851944385.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 11:08:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: paul.y'barbo@enron.com
To: wayne.perry@enron.com, clay.harris@enron.com, dan.masters@enron.com
Subject: EcoElectrica LNG Cargo in January 2002
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Paul Y'Barbo
X-To: wayne.perry@enron.com, clay.harris@enron.com, dan.masters@enron.com
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Paul_Ybarbo_Nov2001\Notes Folders\Discussion threads
X-Origin: YBARBO-P
X-FileName: pybarbo.nsf

Based on today's closing NYMEX prices there is $1.9 MM of price difference 
between EcoElectrica's 2002 Winter Cargo Commodity Charge plus Commodity 
Surcharge and the delivered cost of 83,000 CBM of LNG. That is $5.61 vs 
$4.61. This assumes we pay a day rate of $50,000/day for the vessel, Jan '02 
NYMEX is $5.41, and the FOB price for LNG is $2.66. 

Let's stay in touch about the possibilty of landing a spot cargo into Puerto 
Rico in January. As we discussed, how we play this with Cabot is a big issue. 
There could be an additional $4.7 MM of value that could be captured by Eco 
if Cabot were unable to release its right to not deliver a Winter Cargo. 
Also, let's continue to think about how we make the logistics work and how we 
can get Cabot's cooperation if needed.

Also, note that Eco may need 2 cargoes of this size to make it until the 
Early Spring Cargo.


Paul