Message-ID: <13328022.1075842023888.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 15:00:25 -0800 (PST)
From: rob.milnthorp@enron.com
To: louise.kitchen@enron.com
Subject: Headcount Latitude
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Milnthorp, Rob </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=RMILNTH>
X-To: Kitchen, Louise </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Lkitchen>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \ExMerge - Zufferli, John\Deleted Items
X-Origin: ZUFFERLI-J
X-FileName: john zufferli 6-26-02.PST

Louise, given the number of declines, is there any latitude in moving up the Canadian Headcount. I believe we cut very deep on the 1st go round. Specifically, there is  a couple of analysts and one manager on the commercial side and on the non-commercial side we'd like to have at least one if not two admins for answering the phones (Admins are roughly U.S. $15K/annum and ours are extremely good). We still might come in under our initial headcount given the decline probabilities, but I would like to offer additional jobs asap as opposed to waiting for responses.