Subject: FW: Boston Gas Stipulation
From: [email-masked]
To: [email-masked]
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 11:13:08 -0700 (PDT)

FYI

-----Original Message-----
From: Evan Fleck [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 6:24 PM
To: Nirmul, Sharan
Cc: Mark Ellenberg; Concannon, Ruth
Subject: Re: Boston Gas Stipulation

Enron North America Corp. and Boston Gas entered into an Agreement to
Assign Firm Transportation Capacity of Iroquois Gas Transmission and
Tennessee Gas Pipeline, dated as of November 12, 1997, as modified by a
stipulation dated January 29, 2002.  The Debtor neither filed a timely
motion to assume the Agreement, nor filed a notice of rejection of the
Agreement.  Consequently, the Agreement shall be deemed rejected as of May
25, 2002.

Regards,

Evan R. Fleck
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft
100 Maiden Lane
New York, New York 10038
(212) 504-6027
(212) 993-2747 (fax)

                                                                                            
                    "Nirmul,                                                                
                    Sharan"              To:     "[email-masked]'"                     
                    <SNirmul@CullD        <[email-masked]>                              
                    yk.com>              cc:                                                
                                         Subject:     Boston Gas Stipulation                
                    Office:                                                                 
                                                                                            
                    06/03/02 02:05                                                          
                    PM                                                                      

Mr. Fleck,

I write on behalf of my colleague Antonia Donohue.  You and her negotiated
a stipulation on or around May 15, 2002 between Enron and KeySpan Energy
Delivery-New England (Boston Gas) whereby Enron agreed to decide by May 25,
2002 whether to assume or reject an executory contract between Enron and
Boston Gas.  According to the stipulation, if Enron neither moved to assume
the contract or noticed its intention to reject the agreement by May 25,
2002, the contract would be deemed rejected.  It is my understanding that
Enron has not acted to assume or reject the Agreement within the agreed
upon time frame.   Please inform me whether this is correct.

Thanks,
Sharan Nirmul

Sharan Nirmul, Esq.
Cullen & Dykman, LLP
100 Quentin Roosevelt Blvd.
Garden City, New York 11530-4850
(516) 357-3867 (work)
(516) 357-3792 (fax)
http://www.cullenanddykman.com/

The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and
confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the person(s)
named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies
of the original message.

==============================================================================
NOTE:  The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you must not read, use or disseminate the information.  Although this email and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect 
that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by Cadwalader, Wickersham
& Taft for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.

==============================================================================