Subject: FW: Business Practice #11
From: [email-masked]
To: [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked]
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 07:54:32 -0700 (PDT)

FYI- Clarification discussion on tagging the Mid-c.  I haven't heard any problems internally.  So this is more of a heads up to what others are having problems with.

ds
-----Original Message-----
From: Harshbarger, Robert [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 3:48 PM
To: Interchange Scheduling & Accounting Subcommittee (ISAS)
Subject: RE: Business Practice #11

Your last paragraph is right on man.  It just the commie business practice
that bites.

Again, my view of the world is that the transmission should be associated
with the sink control area - they are the one who takes it home.  The source
control area shouldn't have the fake transmission.

Guess part of the problem is due to CAs not registering as TPs which would
make things much more consistent.

PSEI will take NOR, SINGLEBUS, GF (if we're not looking), MIDC-MIDC, and
other creative entries for the OASIS number for MIDC-MIDC transactions.

Bob

> ----------
> From: 	Hackney, Mark W(Z39911)[SMTP:[email-masked]]
> Sent: 	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 3:04 PM
> To: 	Interchange Scheduling & Accounting Subcommittee (ISAS)
> Subject: 	Business Practice #11
> 
> "For transactions that occur at only one bus (i.e. no OASIS/GF
> transmission
> involved) use a willing TP on the second line with the same PSE as on the
> first line and the words "Single Bus" in the OASIS reservation field and
> "7-F" as the Product."
> 
> Is this practice not being practiced?  I've seen/heard that at the MID
> Columbia folks selling energy to those who have take away rights at MID C
> are have their tags denied because the tag creators are not using a "TP
> specific transmission path or designation".  It was agreed to use "Single
> Bus" in these situations to avoid the implications of transmission service
> where no transmission service was necessary from the MID C.
> 
> If the sink control area is bringing the energy back to their system at
> that
> point then the sink should have it indicated that it's not a single bus
> for
> their transmission portion, but may be "GF" or "No reservation required"
> from the bus to the system.  But in this circumstance then the path is not
> MIDC-MIDC but MIDC-SYS.  That's my take.  Others wish to pipe in?
> 
> Mark W. Hackney
> Section Leader
> Pre and Real-time Transmission Scheduling
> APS OATT Administration
> Arizona Public Service Company
> 602.250.1128 - Office
> 602.908.1423 - Cell
> 602.250.1155 - Fax
> mailto:[email-masked]
> _________________________________________________________________
> Click to add my contact info to your organizer:
> http://my.infotriever.com/cc2tf0ey
>